About
Tom Clark is a curator and writer. He teaches and has worked on curatorial and publishing projects internationally. He is currently an AHRC/CHASE-Funded PhD Candidate at Goldsmiths, University of London, where his research explores infrastructural figures, politics and imaginaries as they relate to the institutions of art. He has been editor at BAK, basis for actuelle kunst, Utrecht (2015–2017); co-director at Arcadia Missa gallery, London (2010–2015); was contributing editor to Para\Fictions – Ed. Natasha Hoare (Rotterdam: Witte de With, 2018) and Maria Hlavajova and
External Projects
Second test post
What is wrong with communities of consumption / affinity style micro-infrastructures / clusters? Is the notion of transversality / institution-crossing freighted with a non-real functional liberalism? Or is it key to hold on to the horizon of a common, equitable humanity as the trajectory of these formations? How they arrange might be non-normative. But it might be inter-operable in the ways the state has not been, and is moving away from. Is the role of the critical institution / art-stack to provide an interface with these — as the always contested site (vis-a-vis AA). Is the role of a critical infrastructuring to build into itself models and imaginaries that can interface, inter-operate, be fungible and differentiable (as in power should not be fungible?)?
Reading On Critique… pp 23-29
*
Search don’t sort